What I mean by that is it’s true that a player could win or lose any one given hand, but he didn’t carry the thought far enough. One time at a table, some other player summed it all up when he declared: “Surrendering is nuts! Why give up half your bet when you could just as easily win the hand?” To a degree, he was right. Most players dubbed surrender as a sucker bet. At least we thought it was weird until we figured out what a huge advantage it gave to the player who used it correctly!

The one casino that was open at the time (Resorts International) had to offer a Blackjack game where the rules were established by the Casino Control Commission and that included a weird rule called ‘surrender’.

I can well remember the good ol’ days in Atlantic City when casino gaming first began there. Lesson 24 – Understanding the Surrender Option Last Updated: February 18, 2020

Lesson 24 : Understanding the Surrender Option.

Lesson 23 : Beating the Double-Deck Game - Part 3.

Lesson 22 : Beating the Double-Deck Game - Part 2.

Lesson 21 : Beating the Double-Deck Game - Part 1.

Lesson 20 : A Field Trip with the GameMaster.

Lesson 19 : Advanced Single-Deck Blackjack - Part 2.

Lesson 18 : Advanced Single-Deck Blackjack - Part 1.

Lesson 6 : Card Counting - Single Deck Play.

Lesson 4 : Card Counting - How to Do It.

I think that you can get an improvement over the worst case by making risk-averse plays, but it still decreases the expected amount of time that your money will last. I'm pretty sure that the expected amount of time that your money lasts is inversely proportional to the house edge, so the only way to increase this is to lower the house edge - ie, play perfect basic strategy. So, what's the goal? Probably to make the money last as long as possible. You are going to lose all your money, since you are playing a -EV game. ROR doesn't really make much sense any more. I'll have to check.įor the non-counter, I don't think that this applies. In other words, the increased bet size would more than make up for the slight decrease to EV. I think that the idea was that if you lowered the variance on certain plays, you could increase your bet size and have the same ROR, and thus increase the SCORE. I don't remember, though, I will have to check when I get home. IIRC there was something in BJ attack about this. I think it's a little bit more complicated than that.

What does surrender mean in blackjack